Rk3399 benchmark. Comparing Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM450 vs Rockchip RK3399. 1/2. Top Single-Core Results Top Multi-Core Results Recent CPU Results. 00GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Celeron J4125 @ 2. General information and performance details for Rockchip rk3399-Android10 can be found below. The first is dedicated to the single-board computer sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2. , in the overall performance, power consumption and core area three All aspects are revolutionary. 2 and DirectX 11. Benchmarks for the Rockchip RK3399 EVB IND LPDDR4 Board lvds (Android can be found below. 0 GHz for the A72/A53 cores. Feb 15, 2016 · Here is the list of best Rockchip RK3399 Phones in 2024. Rockchip RK3399. LITTLE large and small core architecture, dual Cortex-A72 large core + four Cortex-A53 small core structures, greatly optimized integer, floating point, memory, etc. See how Rockchip RK3399 AnTuTu benchmark ️ score compares ⚡ with other processors and check out his rank and performance results in tests. 80 GHz 1 Processor, 8 Cores Multi-Core Performance. The Rockchip RK3399 was designed earlier. Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, rk3399 is around 27% faster in single-thread testing. PassMark Android Benchmarks performance graph and recent baselines for Rockchip rk3399 Comparing QTI MSM8953 vs rk3399. 61 GHz 1 Processor, 4 Cores Processor ID: ARM implementer 65 architecture 8 variant 0 part 3336 revision 2 Apr 15, 2022 · Benchmark results for a rockchip rk3399 with an ARM ARMv8 processor. 00GHz is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. To remove potential confusion about the exact Mar 22, 2023 · Benchmarks for the Rockchip RK3399 Board (Android) can be found below. Nov 7, 2018 · Rockchip RK3399Pro EVB – Click to Enlarge. I first tried to estimate RK3588’s Cortex-A76 CPU frequency ROCKCHIP CO. 07 Mpixels/sec. Rockchip RK3399 Technical specifications and performance with the benchmarks of the Rockchip RK3399 processor dedicated to the single-board computer sector, it has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2. The values below were tabulated from a combined 78 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions. John the Ripper benchmarks find the Raspberry Pi 4 clocking in around 530 c/s with the RockPro64 a bit shy of 800 c/s. USA ($) United States United Kingdom India Deutschland France Canada España Belgium Netherlands Poland Sweden България Australia Singapore Italia 中国 日本 rockchip rk3399-box rockchip rk3288; Operating System: Android 6. Here are the speed tests and benchmarks for the reviewed games like PUBG and Genshin Impact. Geekbench 6. The benchmark results tell that RK3399-T is slightly slower than BCM2711 at 1. Jan 24, 2020 · @merrymercy Hi Lianmin, I saw you are mostly in charge of TVM support for rk3399 and mali gpu. Detailed info about Rockchip RK3399 (OP1) - specs, benchmark tests, pricing, and comparisons with other CPUs. The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Desktop, Mobile/Embedded. 8 GHz with most tasks and that the RK3399-T silicon variant is most probably garbage when throttling down to 1200 MHz even with a heatsink attached. Rockchip RK3399 Gaming Performance Test. The MT6785 is newer than Rockchip RK3399 also around 18% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 26% faster in single-thread testing. Processor. 9. Audio 2. The following screenshot is my benchmark measurement with Mali gpu. The values below were tabulated from a combined 93 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions. 384. 1. The values below were tabulated from a combined 258 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and rk3399 平台播放 4k 视频/4k ui 的场景出现闪屏问题，最主要的一个原因是 vop 处理单元工作在 aclk 域，而 aclk 在 400 m 的设计无法满足这个场景需求； VOP 没有在 linebuffer 空闲时及时进行取数，浪费的有效取数时间，建议 IC 在未来设计中，将取数行为提前； The CPU of Rockchip RK3399 adopts big. 24 images/sec. The QTI SDM450 is newer than Rockchip RK3399 Board (Android) also around 13% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Rockchip RK3399 Board (Android) is around 33% faster in single-thread testing. Apr 25, 2022 · 698. Benchmark results for a rockchip rk3399-all with an ARM ARMv8 processor. Oct 17, 2022 · Somehow the BSP kernel detects the RK3399-T variant and limits clockspeeds to 1. 0 getting a 40% boost. The Mediatek MT8788 is newer than Rockchip RK3399 also around 13% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. Arm did announce a 2x performance uplift between Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A76 in terms of peak single-thread performance. General information and performance details for Rockchip rk3399 can be found below. 2%) MT6833V/NZA vs Rockchip RK3399. 3 Words/sec. 248. I have also observed that there is not that much difference in arm cpu benchmark. Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily. Dual Cortex-A72 and Quad Cortex-A53 and Mali-T860MP4 GPU, provide computing and multi-media performance, interfaces and peripherals. 26 Kpixels/sec. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. The Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDA660 is newer than Rockchip RK3399 and has comparable multi-threaded (CPU Mark) and single-thread rating. Processor performance Rockchip RK3399 in the AnTuTu benchmarks platform. The values below were tabulated from a combined 88 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and Comparing Rockchip RK3566 vs Rockchip RK3399. Performance comparison with the benchmarks: Edit: for extra confusion, I've now found this other benchmark that has a different idea and says RK3566 devices have slightly better performance than RK3399 ones in CPU-heavy computation (relevant, since I've no use for the GPU under Linux). This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Mobile/Embedded, Laptop. Machine Learning. 19. Note: Commissions may be earned from the link above. Otherwise I have gpu benchmarks here where the rk3399 outperforms the exynos5422 by …. Its RK3399 processor is beefy, and up to 4GB of LPDDR4 matches the Raspberry Pi 4. Average CPU Mark. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily. 3,369 (+15. Thanks very much! The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM845, while Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM845 is around 13% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 27% faster in single-thread testing. Dec 16, 2021 · In the single-core benchmark, the Rockchip RK3588 Cortex-A76/A55 processor is 2. RK3399 has high-performance dual channel external memory interface Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. 2, OpenCL 1. The Rockchip RK3528 was designed earlier. The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than Intel Celeron J4125 @ 2. The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than Intel Celeron N3350 @ 1. Benchmarks for the Rockchip RK3399 can be found below. Benchmark results for a rockchip rk3399 with an ARM ARMv8 processor. The Rockchip RK3288 is newer than Rockchip RK3399, while Rockchip RK3399 is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. - 7 - 2. 8 times faster in the multi-core benchmark. 5 Audio Layer1/2/3 Channel 2 Bit rate 8kbps~320Kbps, CBR and VBR Sampling rate 8KHZ~48KHz The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than MediaTek MT8183 also around 13% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 8% faster in single-thread testing. 5/1. Release dates, price and performance comparisons are also listed when available. 10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1. Aug 29, 2019 · RK3399 is a low power, high performance processor for computing, personal mobile internet devices and other smart device applications. 04系统，但是已经参考#28开启了neon优化，并且在确认了*_arm. The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM450 and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing and is significantly faster in single-thread testing. Here you can find the high accurace Rockchip RK3399 processor benchmark updated daily. Popular comparisons for Rockchip RK3399As of 4th of November 2024 - Higher results represent better performance. Jun 23, 2018 · @nihui 请问如何能复现RK3399的benchmark结果 虽然是ubuntu16. 2,925. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM845 vs Rockchip RK3399. 51 GHz 1 Processor, 6 Cores ARM Rockchip @ 1. Comparing Rockchip RK3288 vs Rockchip RK3399. Recent GPU Results. 10GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class. Sep 28, 2016 · Rockchip RK3399 hexa-core processor with ARM Cortex A72 and A53 cores and a Mali-T860MP GPU will soon be found in TV boxes, development boards, tablets, Chromebooks, virtual reality headset and more, and is widely expected to offer a significant performance boost against previous Rockchip processors, including RK3288, and outperform SoCs from competitors like Amlogic and Allwinner. Based on Big. Comparing Rockchip RK3399 vs BCM2711 vs Rockchip RK3328. The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark. 1/3. General information and performance details for Rockchip rk3399-all can be found below. Little architecture, it integrates dual-core Cortex-A72 and quad-core Cortex-A53 with separate NEON coprocessor. 620. The values below were tabulated from a combined 286 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. 56 images/sec. The values below were tabulated from a combined 258 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and Watch Rockchip RK3399 CPU benchmark and technical informations about it. Nov 25, 2018 · IFF the bottleneck is in *compute*, and the test aligns well with the older (2nd-gen Midgard) T628MP6 architecture, rather than with the newer (4th-gen Midgard) T860MP4, then *perhaps* the older Midgard could outperform the newer Midgard by some good margin. 1 Audio Decoder MPEG Audio Audio Codec MPEG1/2/2. 12. General information and performance details for Rockchip Firefly-RK3399 can be found below. cpp文件已经编译，#ifdef __ARM_NEON段代码会执行 通过 shell sudo cpufreq-set -c [cpu-id] -g performance 将所有cpu设置为performance模式（性能优先、频率最高） 但是我的benchmark结果如下 Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. The GPU Mali-T860MP is responsible for gaming performance in the Rockchip RK3399 and shows a result from 11 to 35 fps. 0 TOPS with an object recognition demo, and an “body feature” detection demo – for the lack of a better In this video, I take 6 Rockchip RK 3399 Powered Single Board Computers and see which one is the best!Benchmarks, Power consumption, price!The Boards Are:Nan The MT6785 is newer than Rockchip RK3399 also around 18% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 26% faster in single-thread testing. When it comes to performance, A311D is clearly ahead with around 40% improved CPU & GPU performance in Antutu, and 15% higher memory bandwidth. rockchip RK3588 rockchip rk3399 Difference; Multi-Core Score 1803 736 Jul 20, 2023 · 5. Benchmarks for the Rockchip RK3399 Excavator Board edp avb (Android) can be found below. 28 times faster than RK3399, and 2. 0. Benchmark results for a rockchip RK3399 with an ARM Rockchip processor. Structure from Motion. Mar 23, 2020 · Embedded 3D GPU makes RK3399 completely compatible with OpenGL ES1. The values below were tabulated from a combined 91 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 6. Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Rockchip RK3399 on one side and the Rockchip RK3568 on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. Rockchip RK3399 is a processor for Mobile/Embedded. LTD. 0/3. The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. 1. PCMark 10 score is 24% higher, with web browsing 33% percent faster, and Writing 2. 0GHz. But even more interesting, that’s the first time I see Rockchip’s official RK3399Pro EVB (Evaluation Board), and the guys at Khadas uploaded a video to explain a bit more about the board, and showcase the NPU performance measured up to 3. RK3399. Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, while PXA1908 is around 20% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Rockchip RK3399 Generic Board edp (Android) is significantly faster in single-thread testing. The Rockchip RK3588 is newer than Rockchip RK3399 also around 33% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 34% faster in single-thread testing. Sep 26, 2024 · Benchmarks for the Rockchip RK3399 Generic Board edp (Android) can be found below. Jul 29, 2019 · Amlogic A311D vs Rockchip RK3399 – Benchmarks. 1: Android 5. 6 Kpixels/sec. 1104. rockchip rk3399: Processor: ARM ARMv8 @ 1. The Rockchip RK3566 is newer than Rockchip RK3399, while Rockchip RK3399 is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 48% faster in single-thread testing. The Rockchip RK3399 is newer than Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1. Special 2D hardware engine with MMU will maximize display performance and provide very smooth operation. Speech Recognition. Price and performance details for the Rockchip RK3399 Board (Android) can be found below. Ray Tracer. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Rockchip RK3399 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3528 is lower. 10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 18% faster in single-thread testing. The RK3399 is the former flagship of Rockchip, and the predecessor of the RK3588. Oct 24, 2019 · When it comes to performance, the RockPro64 actually dominates the Raspberry Pi 4 in most benchmarks. 1: Model: rockchip rk3399-box: rockchip rk3288: Processor: ARM ARMv8 @ 1. I would really appreciate if you could help me look into this issue. The processor Rockchip RK3399 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron J1900 is bigger, that the PDT of Rockchip RK3399 is lower. tslk triiff aogxe awyf uivpk pbeof fyndrh scmk mhqwygb vog